How about using tpage and LWP? jeffa
--- Myk Melez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeff Anderson wrote: > > >--- Myk Melez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>It seems like the right thing to do in TT is to define a wrapper and put > >>only the content in the document, i.e.: > >> > >> > >Try a WRAPPER instead of two INCLUDE's: > > > >[% WRAPPER skeleton.tt page_title = "My Page" %] > >the content... > >[% END %] > > > > > Right, that's what my example was doing (although with includes in the > wrapper for components of the wrapper itself). The problem is that my > documents then become just the stuff within the wrapper and aren't > complete documents, making them harder to validate. Also, it means all > site contributors (and their HTML authoring tools) need to know TT at > least well enough to set the page_title parameter, whereas now they just > put the page title within the <title> tag and the homegrown templating > system picks it up. > > But maybe all this doesn't matter. Maybe validators do well enough with > non-document snippets of HTML and the drawbacks to making everyone know > TT are outweighed by the benefit of doing things the TT way (or there's > a better way that resolves this conflict). Thoughts? > > -myk > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
