On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:34:52 -0700 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > I don't see where in the spec it says clients "MUST" automatically > redirect to the URLs specified in a 302 response. OTOH, I do see where > it says: > > If the 302 status code is received in response to a request other > than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect > the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this > might change the conditions under which the request was issued. Yep. You're right. After digging up RFC a bit more I found out, that when method is GET or HEAD, client actually MAY do automatic redirect. So we're fine with optional behaviour here. > So yeah, optional sounds good to me if you need it. OK. Optional it is. > I'm just of the > opinion that we should do as little automatically as possible, so that > the user can tweak every little piece that they want (and so we can > later add new functionality within the flexible constraints of the > pieces we set up now). Agreed. regards -- Jacek Prucia 7bulls.com S.A. http://www.7bulls.com/
