On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:19:58 -0400 (EDT) Norman Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John: > > To my knowledge, "<proxy>" is not set up to work yet. > This may be THE problem. If you can, try it without using proxies and this > <proxy> element. Yes. To be honest I don't think we need such functionality in flood. Since all we care about is web server load testing, it simply doesn't make any sense to put any obstacles between flood and web server, as this could result in false output (we would load test proxy, not web server). However, I see that John is using plain round-robin.xml from examples subdirectory, so I assume he is just testing his instalation. Right now this is done with remote requests, but since we have <baseurl> support, we can write few pages using virtually every web-based language available (PHP, ASP, JSP, etc.) and prepare tests for those pages instead of remote sites. This is just exactly what I have deep down my TODO list... Oh... well... anybody have few spare hours to sell? ;) regards, -- Jacek Prucia
