Jacek Prucia wrote:
Looking at httpd release procedure, it apears that when tagging httpd-2.0, both apr and apr-util are also tagged. I've checked some apr files and they don't have FLOOD_1_0 tag, so I assume this doesn't apply to flood, am I right? If so, we can't figure out what apr/apr-util libs are needed to compile certain flood tag (for example FLOOD_1_0 won't compile against apr HEAD). This doesn't seem to be a big problem, but I wanted to be sure if everybody are OK with this.
the perl-framework just had this problem. I ended up changing the code to use the non-deprecated functions that exist in both branches of apr. the thought on the list was that everything should compile with 1.3, APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (httpd 2.0/APR_0_9_BRANCH+APU_0_9_BRANCH) and cvs HEAD (httpd 2.1) - compatibility back further than current CVS is not an issue.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-test-dev&m=106276645705429&w=2
HTH
--Geoff
