On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:49:07 -0400 Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > the perl-framework just had this problem. I ended up changing the code to > use the non-deprecated functions that exist in both branches of apr. the > thought on the list was that everything should compile with 1.3, > APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (httpd 2.0/APR_0_9_BRANCH+APU_0_9_BRANCH) and cvs HEAD > (httpd 2.1) - compatibility back further than current CVS is not an issue. This is pretty what I have expected. Not every apr based project out there (e.g. Subversion) shares repo with apr. If they can live without tagging apr everytime they do a release -- so can we :) So... users get release tarballs, and developers must sync with HEAD. Makes sense to me. regards, Jacek Prucia
