Geoffrey Young wrote:
whichever is fine with me. Though please explain where did you take that
standard from? I think most modules follow the followinig import
convention:
- a word 'foo' usually means symbol and you'd expect to be able to use
it in a form of ([EMAIL PROTECTED]&)foo.
- a tag ':foo' means, import a group of tags.
- a string '-foo' means, tell import to do something, i.e. a command.
outside of our world and CGI.pm I've never seen the '-foo' syntax. that
Exporter doesn't support it natively led me to believe that it was merely a
convention used by only a few. but I'll accept that it is more standard
than I think :)
And I prefer 'withtestmore', to imply: don't not import symbols
exportable by Test::More.
ok, withtestmore it is. but if it's ok with you I still prefer the
':withtestmore' version - somehow the '-withtestmore' still looks strange to
me, especially within quotes or qw and without an action (as in -compile =>
qw(foo).
but whatever. I'm just trying to make userspace easier.
geoff++
so you're in favor, then? if you are, I figure I'll commit it and some
docs, then hope some of the Test::More fans (hi David) can see if it makes
life easier before the next release.
Yes, +1 to :withtestmore
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
