Hi Geoff,

Thanks for the info and the patch. I applied the patch without a problem
and then went to install the developer release of T::M. Dost my eyes
decieve me or does that say it was last updated on November 11, 2002?
That's a long release cycle.

At any rate, I installed the latest copy of T::M and read your
directions in the patch. However, I'm still not getting the expected
results. I suppose that could be the fuzz factor you mentioned but put
together a new version of my test package in case you want to see if I'm
just doing something stupid[1].

I understand that you can't release this code until T::M is released but
considering that T::M may be a bit longer baking, an additional caveat
in the A::T pod would be useful in case T::M doesn't get released before
the next release of A::T. I've attached a patch against the pristine
version of 1.12.


Thanks,
William

[1] http://knowmad.com/~william/testmore-bug.tar.gz

-- 
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
--- Test.pm.orig        2004-06-24 09:18:31.000000000 -0400
+++ Test.pm.wlm 2004-07-10 12:39:47.000000000 -0400
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@
 =head1 Test::More Integration
 
 There are a few caveats if you want to use I<Apache::Test> with 
-I<Test::More> instead of the default I<Test> backend.  The first is
+I<Test::More> instead of the default I<Test> backend. The first is that you 
cannot use it in response tests (yet). The second is
 that I<Test::More> requires you to use its own C<plan()> function
 and not the one that ships with I<Apache::Test>.  I<Test::More> also
 defines C<ok()> and C<skip()> functions that are different, and 

Reply via email to