Christopher H. Laco wrote:
So According to http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html#C_Apache__TestSmoke__Solution


The sample t/SMOKE.PL files is:

  #file:t/SMOKE.PL
  #---------------
  #!perl

  use strict;
  use warnings FATAL => 'all';

  use FindBin;
  use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../Apache-Test/lib";
  use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../lib";

  use Apache::TestSmoke ();

  Apache::TestSmoke->new(@ARGV)->run;


That uses TestSmoke, not TestSmokePerl [directly] like I would expect
That's what I currently have in my t/SMOKE.PL [sans FindBin stuffs].
I tried using a t/SMOKE.PL that used TestSmokePerl instead of TestSmoke. It wasn't pretty. :-)


And maybe that's my issue.
After looking at it again, I get the feeling that t/SMOKE for an A-T dist using mod_perl really wants to use TestSmokePerl instead of TestSmoke; and TestSmokePerl looks much much thinner than TestRunPerl in terms of the mod_perl configuration steps in the module.

Assuming it's the right thing to do, adding the mod_perl config stuff into TestSmokePerl from TestRunPerl shouldn't be too difficult.

I'm afraid of breaking anything that uses TestSmokePerl, but it doesn't appear like much, if anything does?

-=Chris

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature



Reply via email to