On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:15:16PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >I _think_ I took care of it. let me know if we're not ok now. > > Thanks Geoff :0)
Yup, thanks, it works now. > >is it a really big deal to require Test::More? from a developer standpoint > >I don't think it is, since Test::More is pretty much the defacto testing > >standard in the perl world. but maybe distribtion folks have different > >thoughts. if so, if you are given enough time (like, say, we won't require > >T::M for a few months) is that helpful or sufficient? > > What seems to be the problem? We have already decided to bundle Test-More. > I didn't have a chance to do that yet in that -unstable branch. I was > planning to do it later. It just wasn't supposed to be committed yet to > the main branch, was a slip on my side, as I didn't re-check out after > switching externals :( So in the end, if a sufficiently recent version of Test-More is going to be bundled in the svn repos, the test suite *will* work with e.g. the RHEL3 perl 5.8.0 package? If so, I'm happy... Regards, joe
