Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:15:16PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I _think_ I took care of it. let me know if we're not ok now.
Thanks Geoff :0)
Yup, thanks, it works now.
is it a really big deal to require Test::More? from a developer standpoint
I don't think it is, since Test::More is pretty much the defacto testing
standard in the perl world. but maybe distribtion folks have different
thoughts. if so, if you are given enough time (like, say, we won't require
T::M for a few months) is that helpful or sufficient?
What seems to be the problem? We have already decided to bundle Test-More.
I didn't have a chance to do that yet in that -unstable branch. I was
planning to do it later. It just wasn't supposed to be committed yet to
the main branch, was a slip on my side, as I didn't re-check out after
switching externals :(
So in the end, if a sufficiently recent version of Test-More is going to
be bundled in the svn repos, the test suite *will* work with e.g. the
RHEL3 perl 5.8.0 package? If so, I'm happy...
Yes, that's the idea.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
