On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:57 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote: > +1 > > I suggest giving us karma testers more in the way of test cases. If > it is possible to automate tests by scripting them, perhaps you > could even add some elements of integration testing here. I > generally skip past updates that there is either not a test case > for, something I've never heard of, or something I have no idea how > to test. I don’t' think it's fair to anyone to give positive karma > for some library I can't even run a script or something against.
That's certainly something that would help out a lot, but it's an awful lot of work and it can feel like trying to empty the Pacific with a leaky bucket, which I think is why people don't do more work on it :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
