On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
>   Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
> >Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote:
> >
> >> That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
> >> release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic
> >> live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs.
> >
> >Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change...
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561

Ah, nifty. ;( 

> >> I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent presets,
> >> but I don't think the implementation was done well.
> >
> >No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to
> >have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is
> >controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed.
> 
> fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it
> hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I
> would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release
> source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is possible
> to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to solve.

I'm not sure it is, but hopefully we can come up with something. 

Perhaps a easier way to merge changes from the fedora->generic one or
something. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpSfrU6HkkGX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Reply via email to