On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 04:13 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > So I decided to just bite the damn bullet and do something here (I was > > supposed to implement something weeks ago, it's been a running joke at > > meetings). I mostly followed kparal's suggestion for 'if we didn't have > > openQA': I kept the i386 tests only for 'Default boot and install' and > > 'USB media' and split them into separate tables below the main tables > > that are collapsed by default. I renamed all 'x86' environments to > > 'x86_64'. This will need some changes to the openQA wiki result > > reporting code, I'll fix that up right away.
> Thanks, looks good. One suggestion though, some of the tables have > columns named "x86_64" and "UEFI", while other tables have columns > named "x86_64 BIOS" and "x86_64 UEFI". For consistency reasons, I > think we should make them look the same. Using the second approach > seems clearer to me. Hah, good point. I hadn't noticed. I'll clean it up. In the Days Before ARM, 'i686', 'x86_64', 'UEFI' made sense. Now we have no i686 any more and (soon) 64-bit ARM using UEFI, it doesn't...:) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
