On 5 Jul 2010, at 19:27, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some quick observation on Sugar mode in  OS16
> 
> 1. Software Update is missing from the Control Panel.

Ouch. Yes, confirmed here on the 2 XO-1s I flashed a couple of days ago.

> 2. You have to horizontally scroll in the Control Panel.  There is adequate 
> space in the control panel to have another line of icons so scrolling would 
> not be necessary.  ( This has been a problem for a few releases ).

FWIW, Anish has been working on this, I don't think their is a ticket I can 
point too, but patches have been going to the sugar-dev mail list.

Regards,
--Gary 

> 3. Ruler Activity does not display  correctly. Position of some items is 
> incorrect and the scaling is incorrect for the screen size. It should display 
> the ruler contents with the correct sizing.
> 
> 4. First time I used Record (v83) it abnormally exited.  I took a photo, 
> looked at it, took a video, looked at it and tried to take a 2nd video.  The 
> record log file had a CRITICAL error in it.  Below is contents of the 
> org.laptop.RecordActivity-1.log file.
> "
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/util.py:25: DeprecationWarning: the 
> sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead
>   import sha
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): DEBUG: Got client ID 
> "1019b13323bd71b1c7127828121995514100000025340000"
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): DEBUG: Setting initial properties
> 1278281222.680527 WARNING root: No gtk.AccelGroup in the top level window.
> 1278281222.706910 WARNING root: No gtk.AccelGroup in the top level window.
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): DEBUG: Received SaveYourself(SmSaveLocal, 
> !Shutdown, SmInteractStyleNone, !Fast) in state idle
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): DEBUG: Sending SaveYourselfDone(True) for initial 
> SaveYourself
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): DEBUG: Received SaveComplete message in state 
> save-yourself-done
> 
> ** (sugar-activity:1228): CRITICAL **: file gstvorbistag.c: line 592 
> (gst_tag_to_vorbis_comments): should not be reached
> libv4l2: error setting pixformat: Device or resource busy
> "
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> On Jul 5, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Holt wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for all the confusion yesterday :)
>> 
>> 
>> Subject:     Re: [support-gang] New Sugar 0.84 on XO-1, by Steven Parrish
>> Date:        Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:38:36 -0400
>> From:        Steven Parrish <[email protected]>
>> To:  Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to "help AT 
>> laptop.org" <[email protected]>
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Gary Martin <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Mike,
>> > On 5 Jul 2010, at 01:02, Mike Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > The instructions page says this is Sugar 0.88. I assume this is correct?
>> >
>> > No, looking at the two XO-1's I installed Sugar is listed as 0.84.16,
>> > firmware Q2E44.
>> > Regards,
>> > --Gary
>> >
>> > Mike
>> > On Jul 4, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Holt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > "Announcing a new Fedora for the XO-1 release
>> >
>> > Today I am releasing OS16 for the XO-1. You can get it here [1].
>> > Installations instructions are here [2].
>> >
>> > This build brings us more inline with the work being done for the XO-1.5, 
>> > as
>> > well it includes several changes incorporated from the Paraguay builds.
>> >
>> > I want to thank Bernie Innocenti for his work done on the Paraguay build 
>> > and
>> > his efforts to stabilize the system as we work towards an official release.
>> > Thanks to the XO-1.5 team as well for all their work.
>> >
>> > SMP" [3] [4]
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] http://people.sugarlabs.org/~smparrish/
>> > [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Fedora_on_the_XO-1
>> > [3] http://smparrish.livejournal.com/13402.html
>> > [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Notes (Sugar 0.84 Release Notes, from
>> > 2009)
>> ...
>> 
>> Yes it is still 0.84.  Bernie is testing 0.88 builds in Paraguay and I
>> hope to move to 0.88 soon.
>> 
>> The wiki includes info on 0.88 to help me track the issues.
>> 
>> Steven
>> _______________________________________________
>> support-gang mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
>> _______________________________________________
>> Testing mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
_______________________________________________
Testing mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing

Reply via email to