Hi,
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2.99.8: updmap
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:26:02 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On bash-2.05 it is ok, but on bash-2.05b
>
> Hm... Two questions.
>
> What is the output of
> type ls
> on your two different systems (bash-2.05 / bash-2.05b)?
I'm sorry. The problem is this point!
[bash-2.05]$ which ls
/bin/ls
[bash-2.05b]$ which ls
alias ls='ls -F --color=auto'
ls ()
{
/bin/ls --color=tty ${1+"$@"}
}
> Does the original script work, if you replace
> ls -l $outputFiles | verboseCat
> by
> \ls -l $outputFiles | verboseCat
'\ls' dose same as ever,
but '/bin/ls' fixed the problem.
It's my linux environment's fault.
> That would cause other problems, however. The updmap script is very clean
> about whitespace in directory names and not setting IFS would break this.
Hmmmm...
-- Thanks,
Nobuyuki Tsuchimura