Hi,
thank you all (Wilfred, Mats, Harald, and Eythan) for help and/or providing me with the PDF file. Your PDF printed produced the same result as mine.
The problem occured while printing from Acrobat Reader/Linux ver 5.0.9 on these printers:
* HP LaserJet 2200dtn * HP LaserJet 4100N
The problem is resolved when Windows Acrobat ver 6.0.2 is used for printing.
Additionally, when the PDF file is converted to PS and back to PDF
using pdf2ps and ps2pdf (both based on gs), it prints all right
even from Acrobat Reader/Linux ver 5.0.9. This is not very elegant work-around though.
As I mentioned previously, the problem also does not appear when using previous version of tetex (hmmm... a specs would be nice. Well, the
one bundled with RedHat 9.0 or FedoraCore 2 :-).
Thanks!
Ondrej
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I will send you a copy of a PDF version in private email in a minute or so. However, you didn't say what version of Acrobat you used. It might help to upgrade to a newer version. Also, some HP printers have two alternative printer drivers, one using Postscript and one using PCL. I have experienced that it may help to switch to the other driver occassionally.
/Mats
Ondrej Drbohlav wrote:Hi, I am having problems with the document below. When I compile it with pdflatex, the PDF looks OK in AcrobatReader but it prints badly at several HP laser printers (the font is right, but vertical letter positioning is broken)
To find out whether this is a tetex-3.0 bug or just a bug in my installation, may I kindly ask someone who has tetex-3.0 installed to compile the source by pdflatex and provide me with the PDF?
I will then try to print it out on the same printers and let this archive list know the result. Cheers, Ondrej
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin source \documentclass[10pt]{article} \usepackage{times} \begin{document} Problem with uniform intensity. The input data are not funny either.
Watch the words {\em uniform} and {\em input data are} above. \end{document} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end source
