> The sequence <œ, combining acute> is seen as weird because it’s the > first one in a Latin-script language that cannot be input as a single > Unicode character.
I think the main point is that it is not treated the same way as œ. For instance with right/lefthyphenmin = 2, we have œ́-di-pus œdi-pus while they should be the same... > What do you mean? If I understand correctly, you're saying that in order to have œ treated as 2 characters (with lefthyphenmin=2), I should have lefthyphenmin=1 and completely redo the patterns so that all the sequences of two characters at the beginning of a word do not get separated... If I understood correctly, that just looks terrible... Thank you, -- Elie
