Hi, after some longish debate with Daniel Taupin (where I complained about some packaging issues) I finally noticed that the aforementioned tar.gz file isn't authorized at all by the maintainer. He officially just supports the zip version of his distribution.
While a separate version customized for Unix like operating systems is a quite good idea, I propose the following: (1) More coordination. Why should the zip file contain a different directory structure and additional redundancy (which I complained about to Daniel -- sorry, Daniel!)? The redundancy I mean is the additional system/c-sources directory only containing files already located elsewhere. (2) When a different distribution is really needed, please document it: (a) There should be a README file or similar describing the archive as a derived package (b) The package should even get a new name (I assume the "T" in T112 means "Taupin"?), at least slightly different Thanks for considering. bye, Roland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
