This is an issue. I have had problems with biblatex.4ht. I have to hunt all
over to find the most recent canonical version, and since everything is current
on the Internet, multiple versions can all exist at one time. Where is the
canonical source for these versions? When directing people to get the "most
current version", such directions are helpful.
You allude to a version 1.6. Is that the most current version?
When I run a document which actually compiles, I get the following in the .log
file:
("C:\Programs\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\generic\tex4ht\biblatex.4ht"
version 2010-03-31-15:16
This does not reference a version number in anything of the form 1.6 or
whatever. How can a person keep current in this area?
-----Original Message-----
From: tex4ht-boun...@tug.org [mailto:tex4ht-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of
Christian Fearnot
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:27 AM
To: tex4ht@tug.org
Cc: j.rea...@neu.edu
Subject: Re: [tex4ht] biblatex, biber, and htlatex
Joseph:
>> Have you replaced
>> biblatex.4ht in /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/tex4ht/biblatex.4ht with a
>> new version?
>
> I'm using the most current tlmgr versions. The log file in the minimal
> eg says:
It seems to me then that your answer is No. Please be clear. You need to
replace the file biblatex.4ht with the new version of that file. The
tlmgr installs tex4ht which contains probably an older version of that file.
Besides that, as I have written already, I think that you have to use
biblatex 1.6, not 1.7. There is no biblatex.4ht for 1.7 yet.
Daniel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of the original message.
