On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Karl Berry <k...@freefriends.org> wrote:
[...] > I could easily be missing it, but I'm not seeing no specific bug report > regarding biblatex 1.7, just your report of failure. Can you construct > the usual small test case / expected output vs. actual output / etc. > so CVR (or anyone :) has a chance of doing that? If somebody sends me a test file with necessary bib database, I shall come back with a biblatex.4ht compatible with 1.7. Also, we shall provide options to load previous versions of biblatex.sty (1.6, ...) which will solve the nagging problem of dependency factor. -- Radhakrishnan
