On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Carl Pagano wrote:

> It is what I have been saying. There is NO scientific evidence that this is 
> human spread. That involves work, including a control, and test group. After 
> a conclusion has been reached, the experiment must be able to be repeated, 
> several times, with the same results to support the original hypothesis. That 
> humans as a vector of WNS? Prove it.
>      It's much much easier to close caves, decontaminate your clothing, and 
> then say that you've done all that you can, when even your hair probably 
> carries the spores of WNS.  Unless you want to cave in disposable gear, so 
> that each time you enter the cave, you have on fresh, sterile, spore free 
> gear, the effort is futile. How many can say that they have immersed their 
> expensive caving helmet and lamp in decontaminant each and every time before 
> they go into a cave? Washed your cave suit lately? You bet you have! Made you 
> feel good that you were doing your part to contain WNS. BIG PROBLEM- you just 
> put it back into the same dirty tote you got it out of. May look clean but 
> guess again. You must put your stuff in a bag that has not touched any other 
> surface suspected of carrying spores. That includes the back of your pick up 
> truck you threw your expensive dusty caving helmet and gear into.. How many 
> have decontaminated their vehicles? Tires, carpet, upholstery, roof liner,  
> it all carries the same dirt from the last cave you were in. How about the 
> dirt under your fingernails? Scrubbed your hands in decontaminate lately? 
> Really scrubbed under those fingernails? You wash your hands, then pick up 
> caving gear, decontaminate it, then pick it up again. Your gear is now dirty 
> again because you just touched decontaminated gear with fingernails that 
> still contain dirt under them, i.e. spores, if you ever had any in the first 
> place. 
>   Now, does this sound completely and totally impossible to do? Yes it is. 
> Therefore, the entire idea of decontaminating your gear is equally just a 
> "feel good" measure. Pick up any medical book on sterile technique, then come 
> back and still support the idea of field decontamination. It doesn't work. 
> Same as a petition. 
>   Some individuals need a "cause". Seems like the person mentioned below has 
> found theirs, with complete disregard to fact or practicality. 
>     By the way, suppose you close all the caves? What are you going to do- 
> stop the bats from going into them? Tell them to wipe their feet? How about a 
> warm devon bath before flying out? Or that they are 
>        restricted to just one cave?
>         The entire thought is as ludicrous as a petition to close caves, 
> decontamination, or any other hypothesis that is not supported by scientific, 
> reproducible results. 
>             Pissing in the wind, tilting at windmills, call it what you like. 
>                 All of this is simply emotion based bad science. 
>                     Carl…….
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Stephen Fleming wrote:
> 
>> Total waste of time.
>> 
>> CBD does not care one whit about public opinion. They are driven by the fact 
>> that they can reap millions in litigation.
>> 
>> This is all about money, lots of it, and nothing more.
>> 
>> Furthermore, whoever this guy Dunham is, he continues the misinformation by 
>> repeating (helpfully, to the CBD cause) that humans are a vector. That has 
>> never been demonstrated with any scientific evidence, after 6+ years of it 
>> being endlessly repeated as fact.
>> 
>> Until the agencies grow a set and tell the CBD to go eff itself, nothing is 
>> going to change. 
>> 
>> Everything about the petition is 'feel good' and appealing to 
>> emotion/caver-logic viewpoint, and the pleas contained therein are of no 
>> interest to the politicos or litigants. Money talks; cavers are not even a 
>> blip on the money screen.
>> 
>> Anyone who thinks the White House really thinks your opinion is important on 
>> any petition of this sort only needs to view prior petitions on any topic of 
>> your choosing to see how they pretty much all turn out. This is pissing in 
>> the wind.
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/13/2012 12:31, Kathy Peerman wrote:
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> Subject: Petition to keep public caves open to the public
>>>> 
>>>> As you may know, the CBD is petitioning the White House to close all
>>>> public caves and fine private landowners who keep their caves open.
>>>> This is a serious threat to the caves, which are often vandalized when
>>>> responsible visitation is removed, and does nothing to protect the
>>>> bats since WNS is spread bat-to-bat. Human contributions to spread can
>>>> be effectively controlled with decon, assuming a human vector ever
>>>> existed. Closing publicly owned caves to the public is a threat to
>>>> conservation, a limitation of freedom, and is based on bad science,
>>>> and I am tired of not standing up to say that. If you support this
>>>> cause, please sign this counter petition to keep the caves open.
>>>> 
>>>> https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/support-conservation-recreation-science-and-personal-freedom-mandating-public-access-caves-public/YX8Bjp3F
>>>> 
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> John Dunham
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> SWR mailing list
>> s...@caver.net
>> http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net
> 

_______________________________________________
SWR mailing list
s...@caver.net
http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net

Reply via email to