Where will this be located?

Sent from my iPhone...

> On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:36, Aimee Beveridge via Texascavers 
> <texascavers@texascavers.com> wrote:
> 
> We used to set up a rebelay course.  We gave carabiners to everyone who 
> completed it. It could be done this year.  
> 
> The limitations: a site that has decent trees, volunteers to set it up and 
> run it, and securing prizes.  Anybody interested?  
> 
> -Aimee
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Mixon Bill via Texascavers 
>> <texascavers@texascavers.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Cons--
>> 
>> The advantage of the traditional obstacle-course SpeleOlympics is that it is 
>> a good spectator event at a specific location and at a particular time. (It 
>> would be an even better one if the schedule was well announced and adhered 
>> to.) Some of the components of proposed SuperSpeleOlympics not good 
>> spectator events,especially CaveSim, and they'd be scattered around the site.
>> 
>> Any components that aren't already occurring separately would require 
>> additional workers and might take help away from the existing contests.
>> 
>> People would likely treat a rebelay course that is part of a contest as a 
>> race for time, and that is not safe when complicated vertical work is 
>> involved, if only because it might encourage bad habits in the real thing.
>> 
>> With vertical and surveying components, it would tend to exclude new young 
>> cavers, whose enthusiasm is what makes the traditional obstacle-course race 
>> work.
>> 
>> How would overall winners be determined?
>> 
>> I imagine a lot of potential contestants would just think the whole thing 
>> was more trouble and time-consuming than it was worth. It's supposed to be a 
>> party, after all. How many people participate in more than two of the 
>> traditional contests?
>> ----------------------
>> Seems like most of the components happen anyway, and people can just pick 
>> and choose what they're interested in. Why try to make it overly organized?
>> 
>> A rebelay course (or at least knot-passing and change-over, which require 
>> simpler rigging) for training might be nice, but judging by the times the 
>> climbing contest has tended to get its act together, I wonder whether the 
>> talent to run an additional vertical thing is available.
>> 
>> --Mixon
>> ----------------------------------------
>> True bravery is shown by performing without witnesses what one might be 
>> capable of doing before all the world.
>> ----------------------------------------
>> You may "reply" to the address this message
>> (unless it's a TexasCavers list post)
>> came from, but for long-term use, save:
>> Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
>> AMCS: a...@mexicancaves.org or sa...@mexicancaves.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
>> Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
>> http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
> _______________________________________________
> Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
> Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
> http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

Reply via email to