Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Good evening, Joris.

> The extra font packages now carry license information.
> So this should no longer be an obstacle for not using them

Almost. ;-)

I am glad to see that we are making progress in this and I have
checked your provided license against the terms provided in the source
files of the fonts, and everthing seems to be ok so far.

I only have one issue left: I can't figure out where you got the fonts
in type1/la/* from. Searching for their basenames on ctan.org does not
yield any results, neither do the fonts in
http://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/la/ seem to be the source for
them. The LA and LLA fonts from there also carry a strange licence
that does not explicitly allow modification, just redistribution as a
whole, without removing any parts.

It'd be nice if you clarified the origin of the fonts in type1/la/*. I
have found only a few references to them via google, but none of them
were useful besides your Makefile used to create them. ;-)

Thank you,
      René

-- 
René van Bevern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://progn.org  http://www.debian.org  http://www.pro-linux.de

Attachment: pgpbdnQbhhtgb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

Reply via email to