Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello Joris,
> They are standard in TeTeX. Thank you, I have found them in the original TeTeX distribution now. (they carry different names there) > Well, I am more than fed up with these licensing issues. I fully understand that you are fed up. I am not bugging you about license concerns because it gives me joy either. It's just something that has to be clear for redistribution. Thank you for your patience in this. > If anyone wants to remove the la fonts and make all necessary changes > to notify russian users on what to do to get them, that is fine with > me too. Now that the origin of the la/ fonts is clear, this is luckily not necessary. > If Debian has chosen to call LaTeX "free software", then they should > no longer trouble me with this nonsense. This is true, of course. It's just that it was not obvious until now that the la/ directory is generated from parts of the standard TeTeX distribution. Third-party fonts (i.e. if they were not from the TeTeX distribution) could underlie more restrictive licenses. I hope you understand my concerns in this case. But to calm you down, I can tell you that the license thing is now clear and ticked off for me. I apologize for upsetting you or getting on your nerves. René -- René van Bevern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://progn.org http://www.debian.org http://www.pro-linux.de
pgps0ZbXWkeO8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
