In fact as I type I feel such gratitude I have to say a double thank-you.

Sam

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Sam Liddicott <s...@liddicott.com> wrote:

> Thanks for this kind offer.
>
> I'm trying not to blush too hard a I write this. I decided to update from
> SVN and re-compile and it's like a new world! The longest delay is now 2
> seconds. This is a great relief.
>
> Thanks to all those who made it so much faster.
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Massimiliano Gubinelli <
> m.gubine...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sam,
>>  do you think you can handle me the document (or a faked version) for me
>> to test and perform some profiling onto. In my opinion large delays should
>> not happen unless the document requires intrinsically a whole new
>> typesetting at each small change, for example when there are no line or
>> page breaks. So I would tend to think that it is some misbehaviour of
>> TeXmacs. It could also due to the still not perfect handling of the
>> keyboard events in the Qt port. Have you tried with the X11 version?
>>
>> Best
>> max
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 nov. 2011, at 11:19, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>>
>> > I think texmacs is the best text editing system ever. The macro system
>> with direct editing of parameters makes it amazing.
>> >
>> > But I am finding it very hard to use on a daily basis.
>> >
>> > My main work document is 150 pages and takes 30 seconds to process
>> pressing ENTER or deleting a blank paragraph in body text near the
>> beginning of the document and 12 seconds at the end of the document. I have
>> one image, and 50 of the pages are the inclusion of another TeXmacs
>> document.
>> >
>> > This occurs with or without my literate programming extensions loaded;
>> it occurs in papyrus mode or paper mode; and with sloppy algorithm.
>> >
>> > I came from LyX which did not attempt typesetting as such at edit time,
>> I wonder if TeXmacs might be induced to perform in a more light-hearted way
>> at edit time.
>> >
>> > Apart from the sloppy algorithm, are there any other tips which might
>> help me?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Texmacs-dev mailing list
>> > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Texmacs-dev mailing list
>> Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

Reply via email to