On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <alv...@minin.es>wrote:
> Are you using the QT version? > > The X11 version still feels snappier for me. > I am using QT which is now snappy. I was using X11 which is snappier but i kept crashing when I inserted a drawing. Sam > > -รก. > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 13:01, Sam Liddicott <s...@liddicott.com> wrote: > > In fact as I type I feel such gratitude I have to say a double thank-you. > > > > Sam > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Sam Liddicott <s...@liddicott.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for this kind offer. > >> > >> I'm trying not to blush too hard a I write this. I decided to update > from > >> SVN and re-compile and it's like a new world! The longest delay is now 2 > >> seconds. This is a great relief. > >> > >> Thanks to all those who made it so much faster. > >> > >> Sam > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Massimiliano Gubinelli > >> <m.gubine...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Sam, > >>> do you think you can handle me the document (or a faked version) for > me > >>> to test and perform some profiling onto. In my opinion large delays > should > >>> not happen unless the document requires intrinsically a whole new > >>> typesetting at each small change, for example when there are no line > or page > >>> breaks. So I would tend to think that it is some misbehaviour of > TeXmacs. It > >>> could also due to the still not perfect handling of the keyboard > events in > >>> the Qt port. Have you tried with the X11 version? > >>> > >>> Best > >>> max > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 21 nov. 2011, at 11:19, Sam Liddicott wrote: > >>> > >>> > I think texmacs is the best text editing system ever. The macro > system > >>> > with direct editing of parameters makes it amazing. > >>> > > >>> > But I am finding it very hard to use on a daily basis. > >>> > > >>> > My main work document is 150 pages and takes 30 seconds to process > >>> > pressing ENTER or deleting a blank paragraph in body text near the > beginning > >>> > of the document and 12 seconds at the end of the document. I have > one image, > >>> > and 50 of the pages are the inclusion of another TeXmacs document. > >>> > > >>> > This occurs with or without my literate programming extensions > loaded; > >>> > it occurs in papyrus mode or paper mode; and with sloppy algorithm. > >>> > > >>> > I came from LyX which did not attempt typesetting as such at edit > time, > >>> > I wonder if TeXmacs might be induced to perform in a more > light-hearted way > >>> > at edit time. > >>> > > >>> > Apart from the sloppy algorithm, are there any other tips which might > >>> > help me? > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Texmacs-dev mailing list > >>> > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > >>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Texmacs-dev mailing list > >>> Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Texmacs-dev mailing list > > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
