From: TeXmacs <texm...@lix.polytechnique.fr> To: texmacs-dev@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] Copying tex and latex code from emacs to texmacs Date: 21/06/2021 11:35:47 Europe/Paris
Hi Henri, On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:22:57AM +0200, henri-bi...@francemel.fr wrote: > A summary of commands are listed here > > https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/texinfo-3.9/html_chapter/texinfo_24.html Thanks for the reminder. The list is indeed somewhat long, so it would take some time to write a converter. But it would make sense if someone has the time. *** If it makes sense to you, I would be keen to test it. I have reservations about a converter from TeXmacs to Texinfo. Texinfo required additional information that would not make sense in TeXmacs. *** But a converter from Texinfo to TeXmacs would be useful. You simply got to remove some @-cammands in Texinfo, convert the sectioning structures (and related constucts e.g. enumeration, references, footnotes) and handle mathematical expressions, and you are done. > My routine work usually involves converting equations. A useful thing would > be to construct mathematical expressions rapidly in TeXmacs, so I can paste > them > as standard plain text commands in texinfo math blocks > > Example: texinfo code using @tex command for plain tex mathematical > expressions. > > @tex > \noindent $\underline{\bf Morlet\; Wavelet}$ > $$ \displaystyle \psi > = \pi^{-1/4} e^{-{t^2 / 2}} (e^{i \xi_0 t} - e^{-\xi_0^2 / 2}) $$ > @end tex > > Currently this is easier to do with LyX rather than TeXmacs. In LyX you can > do > > View > Source Pane Of course, there is no TeX/LaTeX "source code" when you use TeXmacs, so this would not make sense. *** It is the reason I pointed out that a converter from TeXmacs to Texinfo will pose some serious problems. Have reservations the utility of adding texinfo commands in TeXmacs for export. But after doing 'Tools -> Miscellaneous -> Export selections as -> LaTeX', you can achieve the same effect without even having to switch to a source pane. So this actually even seems a bit better than LyX, but maybe I am missing something. *** Initially I thought you were missing something, but thinking more about it, that would work actually, and be useful. But there remains the plain TeX issue. Please let us know of possible problems that you might have with the LaTeX code that we are currently generating. I guess that there should be few differences between TeX and LaTeX when it comes to basic formulas. Maybe some of the symbols that come from special packages may cause problems with plain TeX? *** I will run a test session and report back. The Plain Tex converter would enhance TexMacs capabilities considerably, because it will make it easier to write texinfo documentation involving mathematical expressions. Best wishes, --Joris _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
