________________________________
subject: M.F Hussain- Letter to Mr Ram
The authour is a practicing Christian lady who was professor in the prestigious
Stella Marys Collage--Chennai till recently ---
Dear Ram,
I have taken time to write this to you Ram-for the simple reason that we have
known you for so many years- you and The Hindu bring back happy memories Please
take what I am putting down as those that come from an agonized soul. You know
that I do not mince words and what I have to say I will-I call a spade a
spade-now it is too late for me to learn the tricks of being called a
‘secularist’ if that means a bias for, one, and a bias against, another.
Hussain is now a citizen of Qatar-this has generated enough of heat and less of
light. Qatar you know better than me is not a country which respects democracy
or freedom of expression. Hussain says he has complete freedom-I challenge him
to paint a picture of Mohammed fully clad.
There is no second opinion that artists have the Right of Freedom of
expression. Is such a right restricted only to Hussain? Will that right not
flow to Dan Brown-why was his film-Da Vinci Code not screened? Why was Satanic
Verses banned-does Salman Rushdie not have that freedom of expression?
Similarly why is Taslima hunted and hounded and why fatwas have been issued on
both these writers? Why has Qatar not offered citizenship to Taslima? In the
present rioting in Shimoga in Karnataka against the article Taslima wrote
against the tradition of burqua which appeared in the Out Look in Jan 2007.No
body protested then either in Delhi or in any other part of the country; now
when it reappears in a Karnataka paper there is rioting. Is there a political
agenda to create a problem in Karnataka by the intolerant goons? Why has the
media not condemned this insensitivity and intolerance of the Muslims against
Taslima’s views? When it comes to the Sangh Parivar
it is quick to call them goons and intolerant etc. Now who are the goons and
where is this tolerance and sensitivity?
Regarding Hussain’s artistic freedom it seems to run unfettered in an
expression of sexual perversion only when he envisages the Hindu Gods and
Goddesses. There is no quarrel had he painted a nude woman sitting on the tail
of a monkey. The point is he captioned it as Sita. Nobody would have protested
against the sexual perversion and his orientatation to sexual signs and
symbols. But would he dare to caption it as ‘Fatima enjoying in Jannat with
animals’?
Next example-is the painting of Saraswati copulating with a lion. Here again
his perversion is evident and so is his intent. Even that lets concede cannot
be faulted-each one’s sexual orientation is each one’s business I suppose. But
he captioned it as Saraswati. This is the problem. It is Hussain’s business to
enjoy in painting his sexual perversion. But why use Saraswati and Sita for his
perverted expressions? Use Fatima and watch the consequence. Let the media
people come to his rescue then. Now that he is in a country that gives him
complete freedom let him go ahead and paint Fatima copulating with a lion or
any other animal of his choice. And then turn around and prove to India-the
Freedom of expression he enjoys in Qatar.
Talking about Freedom of Expression-this is the Hussain who supported
Emergency-painted Indira Gandhi as Durga slaying Jayaprakas Narayan. He
supported the jailing of artists and writers. Where did this Freedom of
Expression go? And you call him secularist? Would you support the jailing of
artists and writers Ram –would you support the abeyance of the Constitution and
all that we held sacred in democracy and the excessiveness of Indira Gandhi to
gag the media-writers- political opponents? Tell me honestly why does Hussain
expect this Freedom when he himself did not support others with the same
freedom he wants? And the media has rushed to his rescue. Had it been a Ram who
painted such obnoxious, .degrading painting-the reactions of the media and the
elite ‘secularists’ would have been different; because there is a different
perception/and index of secularism when it comes to Ram-and a different
perception/and index of secularism when it comes to
Rahim/Hussain.
It brings back to my mind an episode that happened to The Hindu some years
ago.[1991]. You had a separate weekly page for children with cartoons, quizzes,
and with poems and articles of school children. In one such weekly page The
Hindu printed a venerable bearded man-fully robed with head dress, mouthing
some passages of the Koran-trying to teach children .It was done not only in
good faith but as a part of inculcating values to children from the Koran. All
hell broke loose. Your office witnessed goons who rushed in-demanded an
apology-held out threats. In Ambur,Vaniambadi and Vellore the papers stands
were burned-the copies of The Hindu were consigned to the fire. A threat to
raise the issue in Parliament through a Private Members Bill was held
out-Hectic activities went on-I am not sure of the nature and the machinations
behind the scene. But The Hindu next day brought out a public apology in its
front page. Where were you Ram? How secular and
tolerant were the Muslims?
Well this is of the past-today it is worse because the communal temperature in
this country is at a all high-even a small friction can ignite and demolish the
country’s peace and harmony. It is against this background that one should view
Hussain who is bent on abusing and insulting the Hindu Gods and Goddesses.
Respect for religious sentiments, need to maintain peace and harmony should
also be part of the agenda of an artist-if he is great. If it is absent then he
cannot say that he respects India and express his longing for India.
Let’s face it-he is a fugitive of law. Age and religion are immaterial. What
does the media want-that he be absolved by the courts? Even for that he has to
appear in the courts-he cannot run away-After all this is the country where he
lived and gave expression to his pervert sadist, erotic artistic mind under
Freedom of Expression. I simply cannot jump into the bandwagon of the elite
‘secularist’ and uphold what he had done. With his brush he had committed
jihad-bloodletting.
The issue is just not nudity-Yes the temples-the frescos in Konarak and
Kajhuraho have nude figures-But does it say that they are Sita, Sarswati or any
goddesses? We have the Yoni and the Phallus as sacred signs of Life-of Siva and
Shakthi-take these icons to the streets, paint them -give it a caption it
become vulgar. Times have changed. Even granted that our ancients sculptured
and painted naked forms and figures, with a pervert mind to demean religion is
no license to repeat that in today’s changed political and social scenario and
is not a sign of secularism and tolerance. I repeat there is no quarrel with
nudity-painters have time and again found in it the perfection of God’s hand
craft.
Let me wish Hussain peace in Qatar-the totalitarian regime with zero tolerance
May be he will convince the regime there to permit freedom of expression in
word, writing and painting. For this he could start experimenting painting
forms and figure of Mohamed the Prophet-and his family And may I fervently wish
that the media-especially The Hindu does not discriminate goons-let it not
substitute tolerance for intolerance when it comes to Rahim and Antony and
another index for Ram.
I hope you will read this in the same spirit that I have written. All the best
to you Ram.
Dr Mrs Hilda Raja,
Vadodara
__.
________________________________
Where to invest money? Visit MSN Money Special for tax, loans, insurance,
realty and savings related recommendations Sign up now.
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.
http://in.yahoo.com/
