Pranam
A friend of mine commented that why would I refuse to accept the
AFRICAN MIGRATION THEORY? I differ in many content claims of the west who
started their history and Geography from Greece. So, Africa fossil (fossil
is relied more as a genuine data by the west) Monkey lady Lucy, determined
the migration theory and all over the earth DNA of Africa was matched with
the tribes of those nations and genetic match theory enforced their theory
further. However, a theory developed was Africans were the first human
150000 years ago who started out 70000 years ago and settled in Australia,
Asia and Europe 40000 years ago; then there was tools recovered from
Israel, advance the African migration to 185000 years ago. {even though the
Lucy fossil presumed the existence of the humans in Africa 150000 years ago
only, how then Israel findings adduced, migration at 185000 years ago? Then
ATHIRAMBAKKAM, NEAR CHENNAI excavations yielded tools (see below the
pictures) which dated the existence of humans 385000 years ago. (even ahead
of 2 lakh years). Even then our Pappu of the Sharma Centre for Heritage
Education (SCHE), Is not thinking in another direction but trying to
support the African theory, with a lot of doubts because, so for no fossil
could be secured in India! (source: Ancient Stone Tools Found in Tamil Nadu
Push Back 'Out of Africa' Exodus Date ( Google, January 31, 2018.).
[image: image.png]
[image: Some of the artefacts found in Attirampakkam, Tamil Nadu. Source:
SCHE]By examining stone tools from Attirampakkam, a village located about
65 km west-northwest of Chennai, Pappu and colleagues have shown how the
Indian Middle Palaeolithic emerged from the preceding Acheulean culture
around 385,000 years ago and then tracked its subsequent evolution until
around 172,000 years ago. “What’s special about the new tools found
at Attirampakkam is that they are complex in design and bear the markings
of technologies used by Middle Palaeolithic cultures,” Pappu said. “This
implies that groups of humans consistent with this culture started
dispersing from Africa *(possibly)* much earlier than what we believe.”
Excavation at Attirampakkam began in 1999. In the beginning,
researchers from SCHE studied the artefacts recovered from the lowest rung
of the excavation site, which corresponds to the Lower Palaeolithic or the
Acheulean period. So by studying the site layer by layer, scientists have
been able to reconstruct the history of human habitation, behaviour and
culture in India. To this end, he and his team excavated more than 7,000
stone tools from the sediment layer and analysed them in the lab. The age
of the artefacts was calculated using luminescence dating, which relies on
radiation-induced luminescence in natural minerals. Because naturally
occurring radioactive minerals decay at a very slow rate, the radiation
exposure rate remains constant on a million-year time scale. Luminescence
analysis of a mineral provides a measure of the “total radiation exposure”
it would’ve received since burial – i.e the time when sediments were last
exposed to the Sun. Analysing the concentration of natural radionuclides
provides the annual rate of radiation exposure. The ratio of the total
exposure to annual exposure provides the age.
All theories of Darwin, African etc etc are human conjectures said to
have been based on science; if that is so, we have our Vedic literatures
with more authentic versions which cannot be brandished as imaginary in one
stroke.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop6062txhHua8N7wwLzdwu6YthkZzxFYVfmBX6bAJH0pw%40mail.gmail.com.
