Pranam Our main objection to Darwinian evolution is that it sees *consciousness as a product of matter*. We cannot agree with this proposal, nor does it make much sense in terms of verifiable evidence. Where do we see consciousness arising from inert matter and what scientific experiment can prove that this occurs? Our theory is that matter evolves from consciousness--the supreme consciousness. Otherwise, we acknowledge the evidence for evolution. Hindus were evolutionists long before Darwin.
B G does not support the Darwin evolution. देहिनोऽस्मिन्यथा देहे कौमारं यौवनं जरा | तथा देहान्तरप्राप्तिर्धीरस्तत्र न मुह्यति || 13||chap 2 *dehino ’smin yathā dehe kaumāraṁ yauvanaṁ jarā tathā dehāntara-prāptir dhīras tatra na muhyati **BG 2.13*: Just as the embodied soul continuously passes from childhood to youth to old age, similarly, at the time of death, the soul passes into another body. The wise are not deluded by this. वासांसि जीर्णानि यथा विहाय नवानि गृह्णाति नरोऽपराणि | तथा शरीराणि विहाय जीर्णा न्यन्यानि संयाति नवानि देही || 22|| *vāsānsi jīrṇāni yathā vihāya navāni gṛihṇāti naro ’parāṇi tathā śharīrāṇi vihāya jīrṇānya nyāni sanyāti navāni dehī **BG 2.22*: As a person sheds worn-out garments and wears new ones, likewise, at the time of death, the soul casts off its worn-out body and enters a new one. WHAT IS PERMANENT BRAHMAM, SOUL AND MAYA ARE NOT PROPERTIES; (PURUSHA IN SANKYA AND BRAHMAM IN VEDANTHA); PROPERTIES ARE THAT WHICH IS DESTROYABLE, THE MATTER; CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT A PROPERTY. CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT A WORM AS DARWIN THINKS. There are 8.4 million different species of living beings in the whole of creation as follows: “jalaja nava lakshani, sthavara laksha-vimshati, krimayo rudra-sankhyakah, pakshinam dasha-lakshanam, trinshal-lakshani pashavah, chatur lakshani manavah” (Padma Purana) 900,000 species of aquatic. 2,000,000 species of plants. 1,100,000 species of insects. 1,000,000 species of birds. 3,000,000 species of beasts. 400,000 species of human beings. The scientists have proven with genetic science that it’s impossible for the human population of the world to originate from one couple. The Vedic scriptures give details that we have originated from thousands of couples. Lucy was a 12-year-old fast-growth monkey, and the soil from which it was taken (only 40%) was said to be 3.5 million years. African migration theory was floated from there only. The science could not explain the white colour of Europe and Europe refused to accept that theory. Darwin theory was relied upon: ALL FROM ONE WORM which is stupidity; if that be so in so many years of recordings, at least one ought to have seen any monkey turning into human, which never happened. KR IRS 9221 On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 21:40, Sithamalli Balasubramanian < [email protected]> wrote: > If I remember correctly Lucy was more than a million years old. After Lucy > Ethiopian excavations had provided an older one. > Skb. > > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 14:35, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Pranam >> >> A friend of mine commented that why would I refuse to accept the >> AFRICAN MIGRATION THEORY? I differ in many content claims of the west who >> started their history and Geography from Greece. So, Africa fossil (fossil >> is relied more as a genuine data by the west) Monkey lady Lucy, determined >> the migration theory and all over the earth DNA of Africa was matched with >> the tribes of those nations and genetic match theory enforced their theory >> further. However, a theory developed was Africans were the first human >> 150000 years ago who started out 70000 years ago and settled in Australia, >> Asia and Europe 40000 years ago; then there was tools recovered from >> Israel, advance the African migration to 185000 years ago. {even though the >> Lucy fossil presumed the existence of the humans in Africa 150000 years ago >> only, how then Israel findings adduced, migration at 185000 years ago? Then >> ATHIRAMBAKKAM, NEAR CHENNAI excavations yielded tools (see below the >> pictures) which dated the existence of humans 385000 years ago. (even ahead >> of 2 lakh years). Even then our Pappu of the Sharma Centre for Heritage >> Education (SCHE), Is not thinking in another direction but trying to >> support the African theory, with a lot of doubts because, so for no fossil >> could be secured in India! (source: Ancient Stone Tools Found in Tamil Nadu >> Push Back 'Out of Africa' Exodus Date ( Google, January 31, 2018.). >> [image: image.png] >> >> [image: Some of the artefacts found in Attirampakkam, Tamil Nadu. Source: >> SCHE]By examining stone tools from Attirampakkam, a village located >> about 65 km west-northwest of Chennai, Pappu and colleagues have shown how >> the Indian Middle Palaeolithic emerged from the preceding Acheulean culture >> around 385,000 years ago and then tracked its subsequent evolution until >> around 172,000 years ago. “What’s special about the new tools found >> at Attirampakkam is that they are complex in design and bear the markings >> of technologies used by Middle Palaeolithic cultures,” Pappu said. “This >> implies that groups of humans consistent with this culture started >> dispersing from Africa *(possibly)* much earlier than what we believe.” >> >> Excavation at Attirampakkam began in 1999. In the beginning, >> researchers from SCHE studied the artefacts recovered from the lowest rung >> of the excavation site, which corresponds to the Lower Palaeolithic or the >> Acheulean period. So by studying the site layer by layer, scientists have >> been able to reconstruct the history of human habitation, behaviour and >> culture in India. To this end, he and his team excavated more than 7,000 >> stone tools from the sediment layer and analysed them in the lab. The age >> of the artefacts was calculated using luminescence dating, which relies on >> radiation-induced luminescence in natural minerals. Because naturally >> occurring radioactive minerals decay at a very slow rate, the radiation >> exposure rate remains constant on a million-year time scale. Luminescence >> analysis of a mineral provides a measure of the “total radiation exposure” >> it would’ve received since burial – i.e the time when sediments were last >> exposed to the Sun. Analysing the concentration of natural radionuclides >> provides the annual rate of radiation exposure. The ratio of the total >> exposure to annual exposure provides the age. >> >> All theories of Darwin, African etc etc are human conjectures said to >> have been based on science; if that is so, we have our Vedic literatures >> with more authentic versions which cannot be brandished as imaginary in one >> stroke. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "iyer123" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZop6062txhHua8N7wwLzdwu6YthkZzxFYVfmBX6bAJH0pw%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZop6062txhHua8N7wwLzdwu6YthkZzxFYVfmBX6bAJH0pw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOSW9WsZ_8M53L_d%2BmLNCH9CxNGOhh7hqY%3Dh8bD62ioWiZ-KGA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOSW9WsZ_8M53L_d%2BmLNCH9CxNGOhh7hqY%3Dh8bD62ioWiZ-KGA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopKiDBO%2BnfCSEzPdU%3DMuw6Bo68VxZHDo9MJN0%3DeyB69sw%40mail.gmail.com.
