I am willing to work on a transparency scheme, edit and review documents. I do have a different approach to the question to the Google scheme, but I think they are both worth doing.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > In case I wasn't clear last week, yes, I'm interested, and yes, I'm > willing to review/contribute/edit. > > I don't think an opinion that the idea is not yet baked should be a bar to > meeting. Meetings are a good forum for baking ideas. > > Yoav > > -----Original Message----- > From: therightkey-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:therightkey-boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:22 AM > To: Ben Laurie > Cc: therightkey@ietf.org > Subject: [therightkey] Transparency BoF - there's a deadline... > > > Hiya, > > If you want a BoF, then you need to do the required dance;-) > > "2012-09-24 (Monday): Cutoff date for BOF proposal requests to Area > Directors at UTC 24:00. To request a BOF, please see instructions on > Requesting a BOF." [1] > > Sean and I remain interested in folks' opinions about having this BoF. So > far I've seen about a dozen-ish "I'm interested in something here" > responses, a good chunk from folks who do good work around the IETF; one > negative comment off-list (saying its not baked), and have seen a just a > couple of folks say they'd do work. > > That's not bad, but nowhere near overwhelming either, so more input would > be appreciated, preferably on the list. > > S. > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/iesg/bof-procedures.html > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > therightkey@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey > > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > therightkey@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list therightkey@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
