On 09/12/2012 03:55 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> > wrote: > >> We have a BoF chair volunteer who'll be able to >> help start organising agenda slots etc after the >> BoF approval call. More on that after the 24th. > > Delurking: that would be me.
And thanks Paul for taking it on. > I didn't want to say anything until I had caught up on the list, and I still haven't, but then again it's not urgent because we don't know whether we will even get a slot. More later when we do. > > FWIW, I'm the one who proposed 90 minutes instead of the typical 60. My view > is that there should be no more than 30-45 minutes of presentations followed > by lots of mic talk. I will probably enforce a "presentations must be ready > the Monday before the meeting" requirement and will encourage people to start > reading and commenting on them then. > > The value of mic time is not "I like this and don't like that", but rather > "that one idea on slide 3 makes me think of this other thing that hasn't been > discussed yet". Proclamations of "this is great" and "this will never work" > are more appropriate on the list; proposals of "if you add this" or "if you > change that" are better uses of mic time. > > The fact that we might meet f2f should have little effect on the current > discussion. Right. A number of people have also said "something like this might be good, not sure what" so if those folks can write up Internet-drafts too that'd be great since we could discuss 'em on the list and make better use of f2f time if we get it. S. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > therightkey@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey > > _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list therightkey@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
