On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:04:52PM +0200, Martin Sluka via Therion wrote: > > > > 13. 7. 2022 v 11:14, A.M. van Rosmalen <a.m.vanrosma...@gmx.net>: > > > > data diving station depth length bearing > > There is missing from station to station information: > From Survey manual:
Martin seems to be quoting the Surve*x* manual here, so while I can't really speak for what Therion supports here, it seems to follow Survex here so I guess I should respond about what Survex supports and why. The problem with the example given is that the supported interleaved style looks like this (with the first and last being station specific): <station specific readings> <inter-station readings> <station specific readings> <inter-station readings> <station specific readings> <inter-station readings> <station specific readings> In the original example given in this thread, "station" and "depth" are specific to a station, while "length" and "bearing" are measured between stations, so it would need to be rewritten - this works in Survex format (therion you probably just need to drop the "*"): *data diving station depth newline length bearing GTENC0001 36.3 0.45 257.6 GTENC0002 36.2 0.26 248.6 GTENC0003 36.2 ; commented out because incomplete: 0.52 233.3 Note the final length and bearing can't be processed without a corresponding final station and its depth to make a complete set of data for the final leg. As to why the newline is required, the supported style was based on examples I'd seen of this style, and note taking in this style seems to naturally lead people to grouping the readings like this, e.g. from a random web search result: https://southerncaliforniagrotto.com/graphics/resmap2.jpg I don't think it's ever come up before that someone wanted interleaved data but with the station and inter-station data all on a single line. It could probably be supported (though I think it would need to be limited to still requiring all inter-station readings after the station specific ones because the final line has only station specific readings), but you said your data is computer generated so tweaking the code which generates the data to write a newline after the depth would get you there much quicker. Cheers, Olly _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion