Great. Thanks, Pat. Once again, outstanding job on thinking sphinx! On Dec 26, 4:54 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anton > > You're correct - it's just that you mentioned :any match mode, so that's what > I assumed you're using. If you're using :all instead, then that's exactly how > :extended behaves with no modifiers. > > -- > Pat > > On 27/12/2009, at 4:57 AM, karantleo wrote: > > > Pat, > > > Isn't :all the default thinking sphinx match mode (if no match mode is > > specified)? And if so users should see no difference, right? > > > Anton > > > On Dec 25, 7:24 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not using Sphinx in any popular sites, so I can't say for sure, but I > >> wouldn't think there's any problems with using :extended match mode. Keep > >> in mind, though, that it uses ANDs for implicit logic, instead of ORs - > >> and so your users will find their standard searches work like :all instead > >> of :any. > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 25/12/2009, at 2:33 PM, karantleo wrote: > > >>> I have been using Thinking Sphinx for a while in a production > >>> application and have nothing but great things to say. > > >>> Recently my customers have been asking to add the extended match mode > >>> functionality so that they could search with '@foo bar' type of > >>> syntax. > > >>> From the looks of it I just add :match_mode => :extended to my search > >>> call and it is done. I've tested it a bit and it seems that regular > >>> searching still works the same way as it does in default :any match > >>> mode. > > >>> Should I be concerned or aware of any major differences between :any > >>> and :extended match modes that might negatively impact my customers > >>> (performance, errors, etc.)? Or do I basically get :any with addition > >>> of ability to use the extended syntax by setting match mode > >>> to :extended? I am just a little nervous about simply changing this > >>> setting and moving it to production, but I have not been able to find > >>> any disadvantages. Thanks in advance for the input. > > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
