Also, I came across update_attribute_values in lib/thinking_sphinx/
active_record/attribute_updates.rb... how exactly is that used?

On Apr 26, 12:58 pm, agibralter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Pat, thank you for the response. I'll try to take a stab at a
> patch. Just to be clear, when you say updates just take place in
> searchd's memory, does that mean if searchd restarts, the attributes
> will be stale until the next time the indexer is run?
>
> Also, on a separate note: do you have any thoughts on whether delayed-
> delta or datetime-delta would be more efficient in system that updates
> very often? I.e I'd like to have index updates reflected in a minute
> if possible. Are there any tradeoffs between
>
> "set_property :delta => true" with delayed-delta
>
> and
>
> "set_property :delta => :datetime, :threshold => 2.minutes" with
> datetime-delta?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> -ajg-
>
> On Apr 22, 11:07 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi guys
>
> > Seems there's a few topics being covered here, so it's taking a bit to grok 
> > it all, but with regards to MVA attribute updating: if it's something that 
> > Sphinx supports, then I'd like TS to support it natively as well. So Nick, 
> > if you want to wrap your changes into a patch with specs, that'd be 
> > fantastic.
>
> > Obviously, you'll want to check what version of Sphinx is being used, but 
> > that's do-able via configuration.version.
>
> > Aaron, what you're wanting to is a little bit more complex, but I like your 
> > approaches... maybe the more general hook is better, allowing for complex 
> > situations. A patch for that would be fantastic, too. You can invoke 
> > updates for Sphinx from any machine - all it actually does is update the 
> > attributes within searchd's memory, not the index files - and it's all over 
> > the socket anyway, so even if it did change the file, it can be remote.
>
> > Hope this helps clear a couple of things up - would love to see what you 
> > guys come up with. And if there's other questions I've not answered, let me 
> > know :)
>
> > --
> > Pat
>
> > On 23/04/2010, at 2:16 AM, agibralter wrote:
>
> > > Hmm I'm not sure I follow... As far as integration with the DSL I was
> > > thinking of something like:http://gist.github.com/375411
>
> > > But in general, delta indexes aside, if I wanted to do live updates on
> > > attributes I could create some ActiveRecord before_save callbacks that
> > > check for changed attributes and update the Sphinx indexes like so:
> > >http://gist.github.com/375427?
>
> > > Now, my question is, does ThinkingSphinx.update_index need to be
> > > called on a server running searchd? Or can it be called remotely? It
> > > seems like it just uses the Riddle client and can be called from
> > > anywhere... no need to have access to the actual index core files.
>
> > > Thanks again for the help!
>
> > > Best,
> > > Aaron
>
> > > On Apr 22, 6:10 am, Nick Sellen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> My extension is only a very small addition to reveal the attribute
> > >> update functionality. It would need quite a bit more work to
> > >> incorporate it into sphinx proper (someone was talking about doing it
> > >> somewhere I read).
>
> > >> It suits my needs well enough for now but it's a fairly manual process
> > >> to run it though. I added it to get around the process of doing
> > >> updates to a lot of records and avoiding this kind of process:
> > >> . add a delayed job for each record to remove the it from the main
> > >> index (well, set the "sphinx_deleted" attribute using client.update)
> > >> . sql to update each single record to delta = 1
> > >> . and then the job to run the delta index
>
> > >> I was using Model.suspended_delta { # do stuff with Model records }
> > >> but that doesn't set the "sphinx_deleted" attribute so there was
> > >> problems having duplicate entries in the main and delta indexes.
>
> > >> Currently I use Model.update_all calls (which doesn't instantiate the
> > >> model therefore no callbacks) and manually calculated
> > >> ThinkingSphinx.update_index calls. But it's not ideal still because I
> > >> still need to read quite a lot of individual rows from the db to
> > >> update the MVA attributes (as you can't make a call to add or remove a
> > >> value from the array you need to set the whole thing which requires
> > >> fetching it first).
>
> > >> So I think I'm going to go back to running the delta sql for mass
> > >> updates going forwards and using the attribute update methods for
> > >> smaller updates. e.g.:
> > >> Model.update_all("some things I want to update",update conditions)
> > >> Model.update_all('delta = 1',update conditions)
> > >> Model.update_delta_index_and_wait # another addition I've made to
> > >> perform the delta update synchonously
>
> > >> On Apr 21, 10:52 pm, agibralter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>> Hi Nick,
>
> > >>> This looks awesome! I'm using Sphinx 0.9.9 -- so how exactly would I
> > >>> use it? Set up a callback for my models that call the method in your
> > >>> pastie when their attributes of interest get updated? Or is there a
> > >>> way to hook into ThinkingSphinx's DSL for define_index such that `has
> > >>> attribute` could take an option like :update => true? Does anyone know
> > >>> how Pat feels about incorporating this into TS proper?
>
> > >>> Also, does that update have to happen on the app server with searchd
> > >>> running?
>
> > >>> Thanks a ton!
>
> > >>> -Aaron
>
> > >>> On Apr 20, 4:14 am, Nick Sellen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> multiple app servers but only one Sphinx/searchd
>
> > >>>> the caveat is "it will only work for a single searchd instance" - so
> > >>>> you should be fine to use the delayed delta with multiple app servers
> > >>>> (but it looks like you're not using delayed job anyway).
>
> > >>>> I use sphinx in a simliar way to you and the most useful information
> > >>>> in my index are the attributes (not fields) and you can actually live
> > >>>> update the index for these. I've stopped doing delta updates where
> > >>>> possible to do the live update instead. I've added a small extension
> > >>>> to thinking sphinx which makes it easier 
> > >>>> runhttp://pastebin.com/KgwWREnj.
>
> > >>>> (You need sphinx 0.9.9 if you want to live update MVA attributes
> > >>>> though)
>
> > >>>> Hope this is helpful.
>
> > >>>> Nick
>
> > >>>> On Apr 19, 5:12 pm, agibralter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> I use Sphinx for displaying filtered, sortable, and searchable lists
> > >>>>> of items in my web app. I use Sphinx even when there is no searching
> > >>>>> involved because ThinkingSphinx's sphinx_scopes make it very easy to
> > >>>>> chain attribute constraints together and because Sphinx is very fast.
> > >>>>> There is an obvious disadvantage though: lists are not displayed in
> > >>>>> realtime. This means I have to leverage delta indexing as much as
> > >>>>> possible...
>
> > >>>>> Because I have multiple app servers but only one Sphinx/searchd
> > >>>>> server, I cannot use the standard delta indexer. I have seen the
> > >>>>> caveat at the bottom 
> > >>>>> ofhttp://freelancing-god.github.com/ts/en/deltas.html
> > >>>>> but I can't figure out a good way to send asynchronous delta update
> > >>>>> jobs to my application server with searchd on it. Has anyone figured
> > >>>>> out a good way to do this? Also, I'm not using delayed_job in my
> > >>>>> app... I'm using Workling/Starling, but thinking of moving to
> > >>>>> Resque... has anyone seen a delayed delta that uses Resque? If so, is
> > >>>>> there a way to send the "async_update_deltas" jobs to my app server
> > >>>>> with searchd?
>
> > >>>>> Anyway, as an alternative, I've been using ts-datetime-delta to keep
> > >>>>> the lists as up-to-date as possible, running the rake ts:index:delta
> > >>>>> task every 2 minutes with cron on my server with searchd. I'm thinking
> > >>>>> of moving to 1 minute to be more realtime... This seems much more
> > >>>>> frequent than any examples of ts-datetime-delta I've seen... does this
> > >>>>> sound crazy? Should I try and figure out a way to use the delayed
> > >>>>> delta instead?
>
> > >>>>> Sorry for all the questions! I appreciate any advice!
>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Aaron
>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>>> [email protected].
> > >>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>>> [email protected].
> > >>>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >>> --
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>> [email protected].
> > >>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > >> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >> [email protected].
> > >> For more options, visit this group 
> > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to