Can you try with other words? Can you show us your define_index block?

-- 
Pat

On 14/12/2011, at 11:29 PM, Arun Kumar Nachimuthu wrote:

> 
> When I give empty search, the following is the query log.
> 
> [Wed Dec 14 12:25:23.229 2011] 0.358 sec [ext/2/rel 6076952 (0,200)]
> [model2_core]
> 
> From this, it seems like empty search returns results. I think the
> word search that is the problem.
> 
> [Wed Dec 14 12:26:02.394 2011] 0.014 sec [ext/2/rel 0 (0,200)]
> [model2_core] system
> 
> --
> Arun
> On Dec 14, 5:06 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Okay. Well, I recommend sticking with 1.4.10 as a gem.
>> 
>> What happens when you run a search with no query?
>>   ThinkingSphinx.search
>> 
>> Is there anything in log/searchd.log or log/searchd.query.log that provides 
>> any clues?
>> 
>> --
>> Pat
>> 
>> On 14/12/2011, at 11:00 PM, Arun Kumar Nachimuthu wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>>> Thank you for the reply. I have already tried all versions above 1.4.6
>>> til 1.4.10 both in plugin format and gem formats. But no success with
>>> any of them.
>> 
>>> --
>>> Arun
>> 
>>> On Dec 14, 4:25 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Arun
>> 
>>>> Can you try Thinking Sphinx 1.4.10? I have a feeling Sphinx 2.0.x support 
>>>> was a little flaky in TS 1.4.6.
>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Pat
>> 
>>>> On 13/12/2011, at 9:22 PM, Arun Kumar Nachimuthu wrote:
>> 
>>>>> We used to have a setup of Sphinx 0.9.9 and Thinking Sphinx 1.3.17.
>>>>> Our DB Size is close to 50GB. When I try to upgrade to sphinx 2.0.2
>>>>> and Thinking sphinx 1.4.6 versions, nothing is getting indexed. When I
>>>>> run "rake thinking_sphinx:index",
>> 
>>>>> Generating Configuration to ../../sphinx_index/staging/sphinx.conf
>>>>> Sphinx 2.0.2-beta (r3019)
>>>>> Copyright (c) 2001-2011, Andrew Aksyonoff
>>>>> Copyright (c) 2008-2011, Sphinx Technologies Inc (http://
>>>>> sphinxsearch.com)
>> 
>>>>> using config file '../../sphinx_index/staging/sphinx.conf'...
>>>>> indexing index 'model1_core'...
>>>>> collected 107973 docs, 0.0 MB
>>>>> total 107973 docs, 0 bytes
>>>>> total 0.315 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 342507.20 docs/sec
>>>>> skipping non-plain index 'model1'...
>>>>> indexing index 'model2_core'...
>>>>> collected 6076952 docs, 0.0 MB
>>>>> total 6076952 docs, 0 bytes
>>>>> total 1051.501 sec, 0 bytes/sec, 5779.30 docs/sec
>>>>> skipping non-plain index 'model2'...
>>>>> total 2 reads, 0.000 sec, 0.0 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg
>>>>> total 178 writes, 0.517 sec, 916.1 kb/call avg, 2.9 msec/call avg
>> 
>>>>> When I query for some search term, I get empty results all the time.
>>>>> This used to work with TS 1.3.17 and sphinx 0.9.9.
>> 
>>>>> What could cause this issue?
>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

Reply via email to