Thank you! Realy strange solution but works. To sum up, to solve this issue just place: gem 'blankslate' somewhere at the top of your Gemfile
понедельник, 30 апреля 2012 г., 20:02:55 UTC+3 пользователь mrpunkin написал: > > Mine didn't either, it was actually packaged in as a class of another Gem > I was using, not a dependency for that gem. I'd try manually installing > BlankSlate higher up your Gemfile just to see if it can help. If not, I > won't be much help, sorry. > > > On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Evgeniy Solovyov wrote: > > unfortunately my Gemfile.lock doesn't mention BlankSlate :( > > понедельник, 30 апреля 2012 г., 18:53:02 UTC+3 пользователь mrpunkin > написал: >> >> I was able to figure out my problem actually. I had another gem / >> dependency that was requiring the use of BlankSlate and actually packaged >> it into their own Gem, but a VERY old version of it. By requiring >> BlankSlate in my Gemfile before this other gem I was able to get TS working >> as expected. >> >> >> >> On Monday, April 30, 2012 8:31:47 AM UTC-7, Evgeniy Solovyov wrote: >>> >>> Have just found that while i have define_index block but in >>> .../gems/thinking-sphinx-2.0.11/lib/thinking_sphinx/index/builder.rb:32 >>> where you may see self.instance_eval &block it returns >>> #<ThinkingSphinx::Index::FauxColumn:0x007ffcb6063aa0> >>> @name = instance_eval >>> stack =[] >>> >>> понедельник, 30 апреля 2012 г., 16:10:26 UTC+3 пользователь Evgeniy >>> Solovyov написал: >>>> >>>> In fact i have the same problem after mingration from ruby 1.8.7 to >>>> 1.9.3. May be i missed something but may be somebody can give me i hint. >>>> Rails 3.1.4, ts 2.0.11 >>>> >>>> четверг, 1 марта 2012 г., 1:50:06 UTC+2 пользователь pat написал: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, short of having access to the code and reproducing it locally, >>>>> I've no idea what the cause is. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pat >>>>> >>>>> On 29/02/2012, at 5:48 AM, mrpunkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Any ideas what could be causing this? This is currently stopping us >>>>> from finishing our upgrade to Rails 3, due to our dependency on TS for >>>>> search. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Monday, February 27, 2012 8:43:22 AM UTC-8, mrpunkin wrote: >>>>> > TS has builder (>= 2.1.2) but the rest of the lock file has builder >>>>> (~> 3.0.0). No blankslate gem at all. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Saturday, February 25, 2012 3:21:47 AM UTC-8, pat wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Bryan >>>>> > I'm at a bit of a loss why this is happening... I've seen this in the >>>>> past, but it's with pre Rails 3.1. Can you just confirm which version of >>>>> builder is in your Gemfile.lock file? Also, is the blankslate gem in your >>>>> Gemfile.lock file? >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Pat >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Monday, February 27, 2012 8:43:22 AM UTC-8, mrpunkin wrote: >>>>> > TS has builder (>= 2.1.2) but the rest of the lock file has builder >>>>> (~> 3.0.0). No blankslate gem at all. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Saturday, February 25, 2012 3:21:47 AM UTC-8, pat wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Bryan >>>>> > I'm at a bit of a loss why this is happening... I've seen this in the >>>>> past, but it's with pre Rails 3.1. Can you just confirm which version of >>>>> builder is in your Gemfile.lock file? Also, is the blankslate gem in your >>>>> Gemfile.lock file? >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Pat >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Monday, February 27, 2012 8:43:22 AM UTC-8, mrpunkin wrote: >>>>> > TS has builder (>= 2.1.2) but the rest of the lock file has builder >>>>> (~> 3.0.0). No blankslate gem at all. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Saturday, February 25, 2012 3:21:47 AM UTC-8, pat wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Bryan >>>>> > I'm at a bit of a loss why this is happening... I've seen this in the >>>>> past, but it's with pre Rails 3.1. Can you just confirm which version of >>>>> builder is in your Gemfile.lock file? Also, is the blankslate gem in your >>>>> Gemfile.lock file? >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Pat >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/thinking-sphinx/-/Pxi2ZpkjhtsJ. >>>>> > To post to this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> > For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/thinking-sphinx/-/53mXSnYZkm8J. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/thinking-sphinx/-/pWkiZjJbYZkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
