Agreed. May as well turn the crank again and see if it is smoother this time...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 15:54, Mark Slee <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll defer to you on this. Agreed 0.3 took longer than expected, but it > seemed like a lot of the issues are things less likely to be repeated (i.e. > licensing details, etc.). Also, the less time we wait between releases, the > fewer things there will be to go awry, so frequency and ease-of-release > should be correlated. > > I'm also not sure how much of your time this took up -- seems like the work > is pretty intermittent waiting between votes, but appreciate the fact that > this isn't your full-time job and you have other stuff keeping you busy. > > Since there have already been a few emails with folks mentioning patches > they'd like to see released, it seems like there is sufficient demand for > another go-around. So, whenever the mood strikes you, I'd support starting > things up. > > Cheers, > mcslee > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Duxbury [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Thrift 0.4? > > All - > > 0.3 took an awful long time to get out, and a lot of stuff has gone into 0.4 > already. When do you think we should start trying to get 0.4 released? I > could imagine starting immediately or waiting a month. > > -Bryan >
