-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/6/2005 12:17 PM, Jeff Franks wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After Nick said a few weeks ago that he was not working on the Thunar > website and the momemt, I started work on fallback website. I did this > because as Benedikt said, we need to get the website up and running in > time for the first development release. Today I finished off the > website, and here it is: > > http://xfc.xfce.org/tmp/thunar-web/ > > The website is written in strict XHTML and CSS. It's fully working, > including hyperlinks. The only thing missing is more information. The > color scheme is from Benedikt's personal web page. I figured if he liked > that color scheme it was good enough for Thunar.
I'm sure the wording and content isn't totally finalised, but I have one major gripe: "Thunar has been designed from the ground up as a fast and easy-to-use alternative to xffm." This isn't a competition. There's no reason to mention xffm at all. Xffm has its own strengths and weaknesses, as does/will Thunar. With this in mind, you could replace "xffm" in the above text with "nautilus", "konqueror", etc. and it would still be a valid statement. I'd suggest removing the reference entirely. Just: "Thunar has been designed from the ground up to be fast and easy to use." -brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDHfi76XyW6VEeAnsRAvUrAJ9e64VFHnBuTZaiDXh5Z5TawF/LxgCg4xZC HmYSfYUUh9TWpHgpEs57wHY= =J+Sw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev