Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Jeff Franks wrote: > >>Benedikt, Jasper, >> >>I'm just about finished the new layout pages using NO TABLES. I'm trying >>to choose the minimum web page width to minimize ugly overlap of page >>elements when the browser window is narrowed. Just out of curiosity why >>does the page have to fit into an 890x670 firefox window? To set one >>mimimum width across all elements I have placed the entire <body> >></body> in a #container element. If I set the minimum width for this >>container to 890px will that be about right? > > > 890x670 (+/- 30px) is the average size of browser windows we have here > on both X11 and Windows workstations, for resolutions from 1024x768 (I > don't quite get it why people use such large browser windows in such a > small resolution, but whatever) to 1600x1200. Don't ask me why this is, > but I assume that this size is a good compromise to not waste too much > screen space for the browser window, but still be able to view all (but > some broken) websites with horizontal scrollbars. > > The website does not need to be limited to that size, but it should be > possible to display the website with a browser at this size w/o having > to scroll horizontally or wrapping menu texts. There's no problem if the > menu text is wrapped for widths below 750px.
BTW: Right now it looks like this for me: http://xfce.org/~benny/tmp/thunar-web.png The horizontal scrollbar stays even if I resize the window. Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
