I scanned the document, and although it gives some motivation, I don't see the kind of real numbers that we need to perform a gap analysis.
I am in contact with a few professors of law in an attempt to clarify if any hard numbers can be deduced. Y(J)S -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Airst, Malcolm J. Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg Dowd Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TICTOC] legal time reference from ntp session/tictoc Agree. There were several interesting documents on the NIST Site. Karen and I will be attending the PTTI Conference in Virginia two weeks from now. We'll see if anything relevant is presented. Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Mayer Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:15 PM To: Greg Dowd Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TICTOC] legal time reference from ntp session/tictoc Greg Dowd wrote: > http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/2125.pdf That reference alone answers almost 90% of the reasons for the TICTOC requirements! Pity we didn't know about it before. Danny _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
