Thanks Ron. Please pardon my ignorance, but what's the benefit of this over doing an EthernetPW?
Tony On Jul 9, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Ron Cohen wrote: > Hi Tony, > > PTP is designed to be extended over multiple transports. Some transports are > included in IEEE1588-2008 Annex-s, while the idea was that others (such as > MPLS) will be developed by the expert standardization bodies. > > I wrote a proposal a while ago for direct PTP over MPLS mapping. It is still > available here http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00 . At least > part of it still makes sense. > > Best, > Ron > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > And, how can the encapsulation be anything other than EthernetPW? > > Tony > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Yaakov, > > > > when you say encapsulation what is the intention e.g. at the interface? > > > > Mike > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yaakov > > Stein [[email protected]] > > Sent: 09 July 2010 05:06 > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [TICTOC] FW: 1588 over MPLS draft > > > > Sebastien > > > > Yes, developing an MPLS encapsulation for 1588 is high on TICTOC's list of > > things to accomplish. > > > > Y(J)S > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > [email protected] > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 18:37 > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [TICTOC] FW: 1588 over MPLS draft > > > > Hi, > > > > After reading this interesting draft, I would have some questions for > > clarification (sorry, I will not attend to the Maastricht meeting). > > > > My first general question is related to the objective of TICTOC regarding > > this topic: is it planned that TICTOC would develop a specific mechanism > > for transporting PTP over MPLS as the one proposed in this document? If so, > > is it oriented to telecoms applications, or to other types of applications? > > > > My second question would be to better understand why there is a need for > > transporting PTP over MPLS. It is still unclear to me. FYI, similar > > discussions happened in June in ITU-T Q13/15 during the last Geneva meeting. > > > > My understanding of the context of this draft is that the network between a > > PTP master and a PTP slave experiences full timing support for PTP, such as > > TC in every node (or possibly BC, that is also slightly evoked in the > > document?). In this context, it can be questioned if the PTP timing > > delivery is really done "end-to-end", since every node has to process the > > PTP messages. Therefore, is it really appropriate in this case to put the > > PTP messages into a tunneling transport, such as MPLS? > > > > It looks more logical to me in this situation to transport the PTP timing > > flows outside MPLS (e.g. simply over UDP/IP) on a hop-by-hop basis (e.g. > > each node delivers its timing to the next one). > > But maybe I misunderstood or missed something... > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks. > > > > BR, > > > > Sébastien > > ________________________________ > > De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de > > Shahram Davari > > Envoyé : mercredi 7 juillet 2010 21:36 > > À : [email protected] > > Objet : [TICTOC] FW: 1588 over MPLS draft > > > > > > From: Shahram Davari > > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:12 PM > > To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' > > Subject: 1588 over MPLS draft > > > > Hi All, > > > > Please find attached our first draft of 1588 over MPLS. Since we have some > > technical issues converting the Word format to Txt we couldn’t upload the > > draft before the cut-off date. However we will present the draft in the > > next IETF meeting and will upload the draft after the meeting. > > > > Note that the main WG is TicToc but may require consultation with MPLS and > > PWE3 WGs. > > > > Thanks, > > Shahram Davari > > _______________________________________________ > > TICTOC mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc > > _______________________________________________ > TICTOC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc > _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
