On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:19 AM, jdunham <jwdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ed: > > You're right, it was easier than I thought it would be to add the new > statuses. Thanks for the push. > What I chose was a new ProjectStatus I call "pending" which is really > pending my availability to work on it. > I also have a new ActionStatus called "queued" which basically means > the same thing. > The hardest part of all this was to come up with appropriate names, > and I'm still not totally thrilled, but I think the functionality is > good.
I'm not too crazy about my names either :-) Even though it's not "pure GTD", I like your idea of having a pending-type status on projects and actions, sounds like a "get around to it" status. > Also I would appreciate input from the developers on how to keep these > changes from getting discarded in any mGTD upgrades. Hah, always the $64 question, I would like to understand if there's any best practices for this too. There's a tickler where customizations can go (MgtdUserConf) but that won't work for inline macro modifications. > > Jason > > On Mar 2, 9:37 am, Ed Griebel <edgrie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I like the idea of a "long-term idea" because I have a lot of them too. >> >> I'm just a user of mGTD, but I was able to add a new "classification" >> for Future, this is how I did it: >> - I added a new tiddler "Future/Never", tagged ProjectStatus, content >> "order:3 <newline> button:fut <newline> buttonLong:future" >> - added a new entry to Projects Dashboard tiddler by double-clicking >> on it after the "someday/maybe" line: >> <<mgtdList title:'Future/Never Projects' startTag:Project >> tags:'Future/Never && !Complete' view:ProjectArea mode:global >> newButtonTags:'Project Future/Never' >> >> >> >> I haven't thoroughly searched the code to see where else blocks for >> "Active" and "Someday/Maybe" projects are displayed to add >> "Future/Never" to them. >> >> -ed >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jason Dunham <jwdun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Ronin and Jacques, >> > thanks for the ideas. >> >> > Realms won't really work for me, because I am already making use of them. >> > In fact I'm using most of the features of mGTD, and finding them useful. >> > If >> > that weren't true, I'd be more interested in finding another task manager >> > than fixing mGTD. >> >> > So I'm reluctant to overload one of those features with this function, >> > though I will probably start with more disciplined use of the stars. >> >> > I believe this is a real problem so I would love to hear if any of the >> > developers have an opinion, or if other people like Ronin are also >> > grappling >> > with this. >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:52 AM, RoninTDK <ronin....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I have sort of similar problem: >> >> >> So what I do in monkeyGTD is create a >> >> seperate realm "IDEAS" where I put all that stuff. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GTD TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to gtd-tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gtd-tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GTD-TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
