Hi! Thanks for the answer. :) I think you have not fixed that, at least a current import of the file from your tiddlywiki does not change anything and a look at https://giffmex.org/stroll/stroll.html#%24%3A%2F.giffmex%2FViewToolbar%2Fnew-note-here seems to show that the button still has no text content.
Btw. I think that getting into writing plugins is quite hard on tiddlywiki... or I did not find the up-to-date "how to do this / best practises" tutorial. I want to start writing a plugin but my tries with folder based plugin development are still throwing errors. :D But that's a topic for another thread / more intense google search on my part. ^^ On 14.05.20 23:49, David Gifford wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 3:44:05 PM UTC-5, Faldrian wrote: > > Hi! > > Thanks for the Stroll-Plugin, I like the backlinking and sometimes > the two-river view can come in handy. It's a good assortment of > enhancements to the standard TW. :) > > > *Thanks! * > > > I have some comments... and I hope I'm not intruding into a > community that has a modus operandi that I don't get and show bad > behaviour. > > *You did fine! You will find people are pretty friendly here, but also > straightfoward when errors need correcting.* > > 1. There is a caption missing on > "$:/.giffmex/ViewToolbar/new-note-here". The button content only > has the image, but no text. You can check when you use the > "more" menu - the "new tiddler here" is the only one without text. > > *I think I already fixed this with the help of Gerrit Beine earlier in > this thread. Perhaps you downloaded your copy before I changed that. > Check it at the Stroll site. More menu shows text.* > > > 1. I was also missing the animation, but you offered a fix earlier > in the thread. My feeling would be, that this animation duration > change should not be part of the plugin, as it changes TWs > behaviour to your liking and is not really needed for the plugin > to work. > > *Good point, I will change it back to the annoying default behavior. > ***:-) *You are right that it is not an essential part of Stroll, and I > would like to keep this as lean and as similar to an out of the box > Tiddlywiki as possible.* > > 1. Just a meta thing - and I don't want to impose something! - I > would suggest using some online code repository for this. > Benefits would be: > 1. I had to scroll along the whole thread to see if somebody > already reported the missing button text. On an online > repository (github/bitbucket/...) I could have looked in the > bug tracker tab and read the titles. :) > 2. There is a bug tracker, so different improvements / bug > reports could be handled indepenently, instead in a long > thread chronologically > 3. People could make pull requests and the system would deal > with merging the code by itself. You would still be in > control what ends up in the code, but you would not have to > worry about diff files and people could suggest improvements > and deliver the code for it and you would only have to check > and merge into the development version. > 4. A list of Changes / a history of the code would be > available, this may be interesting and helpful to see what > changes were made > > *I agree, that > * > *1) adding it to GitHub and also > * > *2) packaging the bits that are not parts of other plugins into a proper > Stroll plugin > * > *would be good steps for Stroll. I am quite willing for someone who is a > longstanding member of the Google Group to adopt Stroll and host it on > GitHub, and I could redirect from my site to that one. Seriously, I am > not possessive of it, and I am ready to set this project aside and get > back to focusing on using Stroll for my own needs. > * > * > * > *FYI I don't know how to package plugins, and I find GitHub hard to > understand, so I don't have the patience for those two additional > learning curves. My many interests are elsewhere. I am not a coder, just > someone with years of experience with TiddlyWiki who cobbles stuff > together and hopes it works. And I have lots of generous ad > knowledgeable friends here who have helped me figure things out when I > got stuck. I **just wanted to see how much of Roam functionality I could > create in a TiddlyWiki, and I got fairly close on the basic > functionality. Of course Roam has a lot more going for it than I can > replicate, and TiddlyWiki has a lot that Roam does not. I don't see them > as rivals, but similar tools for different needs / markets. > * > * > * > *Blessings! > * > > thanks again, I will follow the future changes and am looking > forward how this develops. :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/GqqWdGnFb94/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fb031a33-8147-4f43-8402-fc09700d107e%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fb031a33-8147-4f43-8402-fc09700d107e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/20e46f51-5912-cf98-8a02-996c36532ae4%40googlemail.com.
