I *strongly* agree with Edgaras statement: At this point in time the learning curve is way to high for me to optimize > the interface and workflow the way I want with TiddlyWiki. > > I think TiddlyWiki is still a super tool and is very promising with all > what's done. But at the moment a bit too inconsistent, difficult to use. > Plugins help but then everything is very patchy. > > I know for many people TW is a hobby. But I just want a tool that works, I > don't want to tinker with it every day, keep fixing bugs and > inconsistencies. > > Therefore, I think it requires a different organised approach to asses the > vision and make it more modern, matching the nowadays needs and > expectations (RoamResearch, Obsidian content editor, static site > builders...). >
Versions of this are often echoed by new users! On Monday, May 18, 2020 at 1:22:10 PM UTC-5, Edgaras wrote: > > *Riz *I put this project on pause. I wanted mainly to address the editor > experience, but seems like it's a huge job to do. The learning curve of > TiddlyWiki is too big for me for now. I might come back to this project in > the future. I had a fun month with TiddlyWiki, but it was also very time > consuming to make it work the way I wanted and to adjust the looks and > feels. > > For now I am exploring other ways to organise and publish my notes. Typora > (.md) files + 11ty static site builder (html, css, js) + espanso text > expander for code snippets. I like the idea of having my notes by default > as seperate static files on my computer in a universal format. And I am > more comfortable with html/css/js than learning tiddlytext. > > At this point in time the learning curve is way to high for me to optimize > the interface and workflow the way I want with TiddlyWiki. > > I think TiddlyWiki is still a super tool and is very promising with all > what's done. But at the moment a bit too inconsistent, difficult to use. > Plugins help but then everything is very patchy. > > I know for many people TW is a hobby. But I just want a tool that works, I > don't want to tinker with it every day, keep fixing bugs and > inconsistencies. > > Therefore, I think it requires a different organised approach to asses the > vision and make it more modern, matching the nowadays needs and > expectations (RoamResearch, Obsidian content editor, static site > builders...). > > If somebody is serious about this, I would be willing to join to help > shaping the new vision and design in the future. > > Cheers. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ea109560-d9a1-4625-8b1b-a5ceec9ac8c1%40googlegroups.com.
