The range is quite limited indeed (0-10, whole), so adding this to my filter works: +[importance[5]] [importance[6]] [importance[7]] [importance[8]] [importance [9]] [importance[10]]
It just feels very messy. Also, I'll probably want to do more complex comparisons in the future... On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 12:11:20 PM UTC+1, Saq Imtiaz wrote: > > This is usually done with nested lists. > > What is the numerical range for importance? With a limited set of values > there are other ways to approach this > > Is it 0-10 and whole numbers only? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/63139ec6-e60f-42ae-99dd-6d86a4530367o%40googlegroups.com.
