Json is...I'm honestly not sure if it's required or not. I only mentioned it because I got the idea for easy editing while looking at the examples for the Json Editor Plug-in. But as I'm starting to remember TW, I'm slowly starting to realize it might not be needed. I'm still figuring that out. Meanwhile, I've been making some attempts at creating a test wiki to see where my concept's flaws were and I figured out an important detail. It is likely a very bad idea to design a system such that, in order to make corrections/improvements/upgraded versions of templates/structures, you would edit a defining structure for tiddlers when there are already tiddlers using it. I shouldn't mess with the original template file, instead I should make a new version of the template and migrate the data that was using the old version over to it. That realization has a pretty big impact on my intended system design.
On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 1:27:06 PM UTC-8 Mark S. wrote: > > I'm afraid I don't quite understand the flow chart. > > But here ... > > I wondered if there might be a way to dodge having to deal with wikitext >> all the time and just make templates with editable fields. But then I >> realized I didn't really want the fields to look editable all the time >> since, for one thing, that tends to take up more space. >> > > you could either have your editable template fields hidden/displayed by a > button, or you could have a main configuration tiddler that would be used > to determine if the editable fields were displayed or not. > > I'm not sure why the JSON editor would be required, but perhaps your > character data is already in JSON format?? > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4daa6ee4-b2bb-49e2-b077-1821b62f7705n%40googlegroups.com.
