Hi Mohammad, I very much agree that the palette is very uncomfortable to tweak selector-by-selector.
I think this has grown organically and cleaning it up (or rethinking the impact of changing it) is a tedious job. What breaks if we don't have all the selectors currently in Vanilla? I haven't investigated (except occasionally by accident, ha). There are a bunch of "wikilist" ones at the end that I think are for TiddlyDesktop(?) and so add to the number without making the TW theming more complicated. I haven't looked (and I should, if I'm going to be playing with this sort of thing), but I would guess that there are themes out there that don't need Vanilla, with fewer selectors. I'm rambling. I agree with what you say. At the moment, it seems to me that grouping some selectors together, as I'm doing, but perhaps a bit less aggressively (or more aggressively?) will make it easier for users to make themes without making any changes to the core. Thomas Elmiger and Jeremy have evidently been thinking about colour and colour harmony tools for some time, from the thread you referenced (Jeremy's response and TT's link to telmiger's colour tools page). Best, Chris On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 11:52:59 AM UTC-5 Mohammad wrote: > Referencing to Tweakable colour palette > <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/lGabtMCLmyk/m/y_SV5jdhAgAJ> > > 1. Goto https://tiddlywiki.com/ > 2. Open the Advanced search > <https://tiddlywiki.com/#%24%3A%2FAdvancedSearch> > 3. In the filter tab enter [[$:/palettes/Vanilla]indexes[]count[]] > > You see there are *132 *css selectors! > > Trying to create a new template is a BIG headache! > > > > Best wishes > Mohammad > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/391bb0be-beb1-49be-b5b8-7db652f773e6n%40googlegroups.com.
