i don't agree that TW is a platform. a platform - like facebook - has an owner. for example wikipedia is a platform, but mediawiki is not. but of course, it's good to point out copyright issues :)
TW Tones schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. März 2021 um 23:52:30 UTC+1: > Folks, > > What Mario says is very important to keep in mind. Yet it is true that > there are other cases where "including" such as "remote transclusion" > content has a different licencing or ethical profile. > > - The site imbedding the content is a document used by one owner and > he/she is aware of the licencing issues > - The site is imbedding your own content stored locally, or from a > server you own. > - The content imbedded is from a site that permits this, and usually > provides the embed code to do this. > - There may also be some cases where if you acknowledge the source of > content and provide sufficient information, even promote the the service > you are imbedding content from it may be OK, but this can be hard to be > sure you are not breaking copy write. > > My argument would be that TiddlyWiki is a platform and we should > technically enable "remote transclusion" and provide matching high level > legal/ethical guidance to tiddlywiki users/designers - as Mario has done. > > Regards > Tones > > > On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 02:43:41 UTC+11 Mark S. wrote: > >> >>> 2: Technically you are stealing someone elses bandwidth, if you use >>> their servers to display their eg: images >>> >>> >> But if you're using a TW that only you see (i.e. private), it's the exact >> same bandwidth as if you had visited the page. >> >> A publicly available TW, of course, is different. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9d4b7a0e-df0d-4f95-9b96-b6b208ac3d9an%40googlegroups.com.
