Thanks Mario, One observation I meant to add was that my current Tiddlywiki has ~200 subject tags, six months ago there were perhaps ~100 subject tags ( that's a guess ).
I found that old tiddlers that had settled to the bottom of the stream and were rarely 'caught' were not tagged as well as they could be simply because lots of tags did not exist when they were written and I suppose their were fewer tiddlers to link to. Going with the fishing in the 'stream' analogy ... I am finding that part of the benefit of the random option is that these tiddlers are now appearing now and then at the surface of the stream and this is a a great opportunity to add newer tags that did not exist when they were written, if they 'deserve' it then they get more links and tags and 'come back to life' by being better connected. I guess tiddlers that are not so useful just sink down to the bottom again until next time they are 'lucky' enough to be picked in the random list and so there is perhaps a Darwinian principle at work with ideas, I like that ! Of course something that is just plain rubbish can be deleted but there are always inbetween cases and some tiddlers become more useful as understanding changes and improves, I like this concept of recycling from the bottom of the stream with a built-in tendency for good ideas to get promoted and that it changes and adapts over time. On Friday, 14 May 2021 at 15:24:53 UTC+1 PMario wrote: > Hi Jon, > Very interesting report. Especially the "random" list is a cool element. > .. A little bit of "shaking up" may be helpful from time to time. > have fun! > mario > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d3edd112-4051-4fae-9638-972af79968a5n%40googlegroups.com.
